Broadly speaking, man suffers from two illnesses, one that he is born with and the other one he acquires from his environment. The former kind of illnesses do not necessitate inheritance of some sort of genetic defect, rather it is quite possible that that illness is born only with the birth of that person, such that the mother became a channel for passing that illness from the environment to the newborn during the gestation period. Of the former kind of illnesses that one does inherit from parents can also be classified similarly, i.e. the parent(s) acquired those diseases from the environment during their life, or they were born with it, and if they were born with it, similar recursive logic can follow.

If one sets to find how diseases are cured, it should be a matter of curiosity to wonder where did the ill acquired his illness. The way many of the diagnoses are done in recent medical practice, the complex chain of illness is often neglected, and only first-level source is inquired about. This often leads to mis-classifying congenital diseases as originating from environment and environmentally-acquired diseases as congenital.

Let me explain using some simple examples.

The well used as primary source of drinking water in a village gets infected with cholerae. All village residents drink the same water; many get infected with cholera, but not all. Why not all? They have a strong immunity system. True. Based on some demographic characteristics, we can find out probabilities of a village resident getting infected, e.g. children and old people have a weaker immunity system and hence higher probability, etc. Among those getting infected, some would have a reason for having their immunity system weaker than the attack of the disease, but some won’t have any reason. These people who, if they were healthy, should have an immune system strong enough to combat the disease, but they didn’t.

So, in this scenario, among those getting infected, there would be two kinds, (i) for which it is natural to get infected e.g. children, or old-aged people, and (ii) those who have another illness. The people pertaining to type (ii) again either were born with that illness, or acquired it during their life. But it is this other illness that is the actual illness and not the cholera. No doubt, hygienic measures should be adopted to avoid the spread of this disease, but this other illness that a significant portion of population suffer with, too demands serious attention.

Unlike the level-1 cause (Vibrio cholerae), the level-2 cause (the pre-existing illness) is never given attention. The reason for that, is that it is quite possible that a person has some form of illness (congenital or environmentally-acquired) and it stays dormant during the whole life, and the person might live through his life without ever getting in much trouble due to that illness, and hence never noticing that he has some sort of personal illness as well.

Now, let’s turn to another class of diseases that is commonly referred to as mental diseases. Many of them are considered to be congenital. I think that among those mental diseases considered as congenital, many actually aren’t and are rather environmentally acquired. I don’t have any factual evidence for it, but the way I see it, the perspective with which this problem is looked at alters the understanding of it. To explain further the reasoning for my belief, let me introduce two terms, one is the substance, and the other is stimuli. In the last example, I used another term, personal illness, by which I meant that the substance of the person was ill, and the stimulus – the cholerae bacterium, even though a cause in the chain, was a secondary cause and thus it should be concern of our secondary attention. Primary attention should be given to the personal illnesses borne by those members of the population.

If you think about this affair, you’d come to the conclusion that it really is a matter of perspective. It is the matter of whether we call a certain person’s substance susceptible to a certain stimulus ill or not. In diagnosis of many of physical diseases, if a stimulus is found to be responsible for the disease, the health of the substance is not brought to question. Contrarily, in diagnosis of mental diseases, it is most often the substance that is considered to be unhealthy and stimuli in the causal chain are rarely held to be the primary cause of illness.

So, the real question that arises in diagnosis of illnesses is that if a substance is susceptible to certain stimuli, is that susceptibility in itself a bad thing or not?

Regarding many of the mental diseases, the susceptibility of certain stimuli is a part of that person’s idiosyncratic nature, which I believe cannot and should not be termed as the illness in itself. The very same idiosyncratic nature that make some people susceptible to certain stimuli, oftentimes also grants wonderful intellectual capabilities. Therefore, for mental illnesses, I believe focus should be on taking care of those stimuli instead of altering the substance through medications. Thinking again about the idea that it not correct to call such a substance to be actually ill, one realizes that the term mental illness itself is incorrect for a large variety of problems that we term as mental illnesses.

If we are able to get more clue about even the first few levels in the causal chain for our illnesses, it would be a breakthrough in the way we cure our diseases, keep ourselves healthy, and distinguish illness from what is not actually an illness.

 Whenever someone asks my take on some topic, or whenever I see two persons debating about some topic, the first thing I do is to ask, “What do you exactly mean by <topic>?” Oftentimes, that unclogs that debate, and some real discussion starts.

Once you start throwing this question at all places where its applicable (even when you hear a debate on YouTube, you can ask yourself, what do these people exactly mean by that thing they are arguing about?), you will realize the insane amount of times people misbelieve what other person means by something.

If the thing is a catchphrase or a buzzword, the probability of this problem existing is nearly 100%.

Anyways, who hasn’t heard “get out of comfort zone” and all those stuff?

But it is insane how many people haven’t even thought about what they mean by comfort zone. Most of the times people say this, it means “do things that seem difficult to you”. But if you think about it, is there even any point in doing something just because it seems difficult to you? Without any conditionality, this is absolute nonsense. Same logic applies to similar phrases like “things that don’t kill you make you stronger“.

So, Tamseel Kun, are you going to defy the conventional wisdom of ancient masters?

Haha, yes, I am. What can you do? Beat it if you can.

Just kidding.

If you ever take a survey from a population to measure the extremeness of difficulty of things that people think they are supposed to do when it is said “to get out of comfort zone“, you will find out a systematic bias in the results. That extremeness of difficulty will be much higher for those people who tend to be weaker in those areas of life that are considered to be more important by their social circle even if they are exceptional in some area of life that is not held in very high regard by the society. Meanwhile an average respondent measures the things he thinks people are supposed to do to get out of comfort zone as much less difficult than the first group.

I believe this phenomenon is general but the specific area that brought me to this concept was socializing. It is very common for introverts to receive the advice to socialize more even when they hate it, and it only drains their precious energy which could have found a much better use in some other thing.

For people having some sort of mental difficulties, it is a torture sometimes to get out of their comfort zone, but it is bizarre how widely we exclaim this thing without understanding it.

Coming back to conventional wisdom, if you think about some giant leap that you made in your life because of doing something difficult, you will realize that even though it felt hell of a difficult, there was still some safety net out there (even if you don’t realize at first). For anyone who thinks, it is important to take unbounded risks to achieve some sort of greatness in life, I would suggest you to rethink your ideology, and let me know if you conclude that you are right. 

I have been meaning to write on this for so much time.

Unrelatedly, I have been meaning to delete my Linkedin account for so much time.

So, it is today that I decided to do both.

For me, who started playing with computers at the age of 4, computers have always been fascinating machines, but my experience of interacting with people on internet is relatively new. I do feel nostalgia for the time when we used Yahoo and Gmail messenger to talk with our relatives far away, but I was a kid at that time, and it’s just nostalgia. My later use of internet consisted mostly of playing flash games on Miniclip, Friv, etc., and learning about random tech stuff to fix things for other people like, how to install Windows, how to wipe an iPhone with forgotten password, how to install a paid mobile game for free, how to install phonetic Urdu keyboard and format Urdu documents in Word, how to make printers work, how to flash a stock ROM on android device, etc.

My first interaction with people on the internet happened in 2020.

---

I was in grade 11, and I don’t remember how, but somehow on the internet, I learned about a place where they were providing free online courses related to tech skills. It was called DigiSkills. At that time, just the term GraPHic deSigN fascinated me so much that I enrolled in that course. A few months after, I realized graphic design is not my thing. By that time, I had accidentally stumbled upon a website-maker called Google Sites¹.

Google Sites just blew my mind. How easy it was to create cool-looking² websites for FREE³! Using Google Sites in a practical setting for disseminating information for a local community that I was part of, made me realize⁴ that websites were my thing. So when I figured that WordPress, the course of which was offered by DigiSkills, was a tool for creating websites, I started watching the videos of that course on YouTube⁵. The time was 2020 when I was in college⁶ but the educational institutes were closed due to Covid-lockdown.

Incidentally, using an anonymous FB profile⁷, I joined the Facebook group that the instructor Saad Hamid had made for those taking the course. There, Saad Hamid (who was working at Google that time) posted about CloudSeekho, an online bootcamp (though they never called it bootcamp) to learn about Google Cloud. The interesting thing was that those would finish it would get GoOgLE-branded swags. I knew nothing about cloud other than the fact that iCloud and Google Drive were cloud, but to the 16yo me, those swags looked cool. The bootcamp was aimed at CS undergrads in Pakistan, and here I was — a college-student who had chosen biology instead of computer science (just so he could avoid math⁸), but the bootcamp only required you to be a student and that I was. Still, I commented on that post by Saad Hamid asking if a non-CS 16-yo could do it. He replied with something that was synonymous to, it’s worth giving a try. So did I.

---

That bootcamp (CloudSeekho S1) was my first experience interacting with people on internet. There was a slack channel for communication. I was a bit afraid about if I’d be able to do the labs that we were supposed to do, but they turned out to be pretty easy. All I had to do was start the lab, and follow the instructions. I understood very little about the different tools⁹ being used like load balancer, or compute instances, etc. but I could follow the instructions very precisely. It got so well to the extent that I was one of the persons helping out people telling them of some mistakes in the instructions of a few labs. Contributing to these elder people studying in UniVErSitY felt really cool. In that bootcamp, I made my first (sort-of) internet companions¹⁰ and also, my first Linkedin account.

Two individuals I continued interacting with after the bootcamp were YM and KK. The actual interactions probably weren’t that many, but when someone had something publicly shared that influenced me, like made me do something or change my behavior or perception about something, I am counting that as well. So both, KK and YM became an influence.

KK used to sketch and make illustrations and had uploaded some of them on Behance. The failed graphic designer of me, liked that. I too, made a Behance account and uploaded there some of my (failed) logo designs, photographs I had taken of birds and sky and a spider (using my father’s mobile), and digitalized colored versions of two sketches of our college classroom that my only¹¹ friend at college had drawn on paper. KK also shared with me playlist of a really cool course called “Git and Github for Poets” with me, through which I got to learn about them years before I would use them for actual code.

YM had a Medium account with some writings. That form of writing was new to me. Writings not from famous long-dead writers that some bunch of so-called academicians decided to put in our curriculum¹², rather from everyday living human-beings about their experiences and thoughts. Some of YM’s writings changed my behavior about some things, and made me do some things. Inspired by YM, I started writing on Medium and started taking freelancing seriously. Before that, I used to think freelancing could only be done by full-time professionals, but YM was a living example of non-professional (professional = years of experience) student actually doing freelancing. Also, through YM, I got to know of a web-dev bootcamp that will be mentioned later.

---

My interest in Google Sites that had started before CloudSeekho, continued adjacent to it and also afterwards. I had learned various tricks, the coolest among which, I thought, was of getting a FREE¹³ domain connected to Google Sites. I made some videos about these and uploaded them on YouTube, but I couldn’t find any place where people talked about Google Sites. So, I created a Facebook Group for it and shared link to it under those YouTube videos. Slowly, people started joining it. The group was small, but I could share those tricks there, and talk to other people who used Google Sites, and help them with their issues. Since, it was the pre-mobile era (atleast for me), one had to actually open Facebook to see what was there, and since there could be days when one could not open it, I thought it would be a good idea to add another moderator to the group as well. So, I made a Moderators Required post there. Only one person — JB1 — commented, who was also a teenager like me. So, I texted JB1 to ask about his experience with Google Sites, and it turned out, that he had much more experience with Google Sites than me. I happily made him the moderator and I also got to learn some random things about him, like his interest in drones and flying.

With JB1 as moderator, I no longer needed to pay that much attention to that group. And some time afterwards, I deleted my anonymous FB account, which automatically made JB1 the group admin. Much later, when I made a new FB account, I saw that he had grown that group into a thing, in a way I never could. It was very nice talking to him again. Then, again I deleted that account. Just this last year, I connected with him on Linkedin, and it was as good talking to him as before.

---

Back to 2020, few months after CloudSeekho, YM posted on linkedin about a free online web-development bootcamp for Pakistanis. This bootcamp, again was not called bootcamp, rather an internship, which it obviously wasn’t. By this time, I had learned about WordPress, but knew nothing about HTML, CSS, JS stuff. So, I joined it. The communication for this one, happened in an FB group where only admin could post, so it was not organized in a way, you would have many interactions with other people. If anyone had any problem with a task, they would have to comment under that week’s post, and there, admin or someone else could reply explaining what’s wrong in their solution. Once, I replied to a problem someone had commented under the admin’s post, explaining the issue in it. Unexpectedly, that person, JB2, later started conversation in FB Messenger. After a few days, we two were, sort of, doing this bootcamp together. We would both ask for help whenever one of us got stuck in a problem, or we just ask out each other’s progress and so. That was my second (and probably last) experience when I realized learning is much more fun when done together. An interesting fact was that JB2 was an electrical engineering student and like me, was doing it as a fun side-thing.

---

By the end of 2020, I had started using Medium that I had gotten to know about through YM. I started writing some things¹⁴ and also started following some other people who used to wrote on Medium, one of which was 0xA. I occasionally commented on his writings, and he — who had followed me back — occasionally commented on mine. His writing theme was unlike other people on Medium. He was reader of Camus, Kafka and the like. At that time, he was in his early twenties, and I couldn’t actually understand what he was experiencing by reading his creative writings about his experiences but they felt so original that I was attracted towards them. Later, when I got to university, somehow I started understanding his writings more. That is when I again reached out to him, and we started talking on email (with gaps of 5-7 months).

---

In 2021, I deleted my Linkedin account after a year or so of creating it. Initially, I hadn’t understood the dopamine hit I would get on each comment and like, that I got on my posts. At that time, I would connect (on Linkedin) with every other person, and some of my posts had gone somewhat popular. Slowly, I started becoming conscious of this dopamine hit and it made me sick. So, I was around 17 when I quit linkedin first time.

That year, I totally revamped my Fiverr profile, and finally landed my first order. To this day, I don’t understand why MR —my first freelance client — trusted me so blindly with that order¹⁵. He was a very kind person and was undergoing cancer treatment. I was really saddened when I learned about his demise two years later.

---

In 2022, I moved to Lahore for university. That year, I got to enjoy a lot of solitude, and also, the freelancing thing started realizing. Later, I also re-made my Linkedin account as a strategic-compulsion¹⁶.

---

In 2023, I found xyT on internet who became a heavy influence. But with him, I never interacted as such¹⁷ It started when I stumbled upon a blog that he and his friends had created when they were in university (back in 2014). Reading his blogposts, I was mesmerized. I became certain that if there was any person on Earth who could ever understand me, it was him. I read his writings like a holy scripture. I read all of his blogposts multiple times. Every Facebook, Instagram, Twitter post he made, I read. Every YouTube video made by him, or in which he appeared, I watched, multiple times. I still have a folder on my laptop with screenshots of some his posts.

That was a strange time in my life, when the absurdity of everyday lives of people had started haunting me. There were books, but my taste in reading hadn’t developed that much, and I couldn’t resonate much with the authors, but with xyT, I resonated deeply, and he influenced me in a way, that made me do a lot of things, which I lack the space here to explain. But in his company, I spent a great deal of time.

By the start of 2024, I started realizing that despite admiring someone, there’s a limit to which you could or should imitate their style and that limit I had already hit. In his own words: There’s no template to life. I say make your own way, follow your own style and leave your own mark. xyT gave me company when I needed it the most, but now it was time to say good-bye.

---

Something interesting started happening in early 2024. I started going down some interesting rabbitholes on the internet. And those rabbitholes led me to a place that I was long in search of – the unindexed web of non-corporatish personal websites.

It is very difficult to accidentally stumble upon such stuff, but it is like a thread that once you have gotten hold of, you can pull it all the way up. The metaphorical end of this thread was Curius extension. I started reading blogs, personal websites, digital gardens made by people around the world. I was like those desert Bedouins mentioned by Exupéry, who were once taken to France and were shown a waterfall, and when they were told it was time to go, they exclaimed they should wait … (for what?) … for the waterfall to finish. I was waiting for this niche content I had discovered on the internet to finish, only to realize this was tremendously more than what I could consume in my entire life; more and more of it just kept sprouting.

---

A little down the road in 2024, I started aggressively curating my Linkedin feed. I removed from my connections all people with whom I had never interacted. Of those connections I personally knew, I unfollowed a lot. Now, I was only following people whom I thought were doing good work. Most of them were unrelated to things I was interested in. There were designers, marketeers, typographers, etc. but they were all those whom I thought were really good at what they did. So, through one such designer whom I had started following after seeing a Karachi-bus-simulator made by him, I stumbled upon profile of another person, TA, who was to become another influence.

By that time, I was almost sick of Linkedin (this is summer 2024 btw) because despite my aggressive attempts to curate my feed, absurdity kept creeping into it. Seeing TA’s profile was like a summer breeze. I instantly knew this was the kind of person I would have loved having as a school/ college/ university friend had he existed in those times in those places. Amusingly, the first essay/ blogpost I was redirected to from TA’s posts, was of Henrik Karlsson¹⁸, titled “A blog post is a very long and complex search query to find fascinating people and make them route interesting stuff to your inbox”. To some extent, I think, it did turn out this way, with his blogposts.

So, I sent him a connection request which he accepted, and one day, I struck a conversation with him¹⁹. It went unexpectedly good. I never had imagined that someone in their first conversation with someone on internet would invite them to tea whenever they visit his city.

The perk of having a person you resonate with, as an internet-companion is that you can ask them questions, the answers to which although they give from their perspective, somehow help you in formulation of your own perspectives. Plus, you get introduced to a whole range of content (books and internet-essays in this case) that you would love consuming. Plus, you can rant to them (in a sensible manner) about things that frustrate you. For some strange reason, when someone says, same dude, or, us bro us (not as a cliché, but in an intentional way) about something not commonly felt, it feels really satisfying.

TA pushed me to do some things that I wouldn’t have done otherwise. But even if one doesn’t explicitly nudge you to do something, when there’s a chance that someone you look up to might see, you do things. One becomes less reliant of this feeling with time, but it’s much helpful when one’s starting out a particular sort of things.

---

In late 2024, once scrolling on twitter, I saw a tweet that I found much resonating. The post author had a personal website mentioned in bio. I opened it and found it amazing. I cold-emailed them telling that I loved their website. They replied with much kindness telling that they were not expecting anyone to stumble upon their website, and that they hadn’t updated it in a while. I then told them that I have been planning on making my own website for some time as well, and then they nudged me to just get a very basic website with skeletal html get up within an hour of reading their email. Not within an hour, but I did that within 24 hours of reading that. That v0.1 of my website wasn’t something I was too proud of. I shared it with TA, and he shared it on his Linkedin without me asking him to do so. A lot more people than I had expected, liked that website, which in turn made me update it to v1.0 — that still was liked by more people than I had expected.

---

Sort of digression, but interesting. When I told about inFilter (a chrome extension I was building those days) to someone on twitter, they told me they use a twitter equivalent of it and I have been using it since then. Once, I switched to Firefox browser for a while and opening up twitter literally got me scared. It’s insane how often we continue with horrible defaults when they could be drastically improved as easily as installing an extension.

---

One last encounter with which I would finish this stupidly-long essay²⁰ is with JB3 who after reading my announcement of closing of my blog that I had started in 2023 (in imitation of the blog in which xyT wrote) had contacted me to ask if JB3 could re-start that blog. I used to think that that blog existed in void, so it was interesting to learn that someone had found it interesting enough to think about re-starting it.

---

That brings us to today — when I have decided to quit linkedin for the third time²¹.

Linkedin is absurd. On the other hand, there are some interesting people on Linkedin as well (some of whom, I suppose, are there due to strategic compulsion). This makes making such a decision difficult.

However, the reason I have finally decided to quit linkedin is actually different, but quite simple. I need solitude.

---

If you liked reading this, you will probably enjoy reading this series of four essays by Henrik Karlsson. If somehow, you have reached here and would want to be able to hear from me about interesting things that I—at some point in future—might want to share, write me an email²².

Warmly,
TA0

---

1. Which reminds me that 3 or 4 years before that, I had stumbled upon blogger.com and had been fascinated by it as well, which makes me realize I had been stumbling upon interesting things on internet before, but I remember little of them. I will sometime try to make a proper record of those things. ↩︎
2. contrary to the old-school blogspot themes ↩︎
3. You don’t understand the importance of free services, unless you are a kid without a bank account and who doesn’t even know how credit card works and who would get a panic-attack just by the thought of asking parents for credit card details (not because your parents are so strict, but because online transactions aren’t the norm and how would you explain them).
   A digression inside digression, but this one’s funny: Although I didn’t know about credit cards but even 14-yo me knew how easypaisa worked and was smart enough to convince his brother to make an easypaisa account on his SIM, into which I could get some physical cash (that I personally owned) to be deposited via a local shop, that consequently I could send to a random trader on an online p2p exchange to buy some bitcoin (back in 2018 before the hype), that in turn I could use to buy a new coin which was being offered in ICO, but wasn’t smart enough to realize that it was a scam, and there was no actual coin. oops :\ ↩︎
4. realize here does not mean a global realization, but a realization that was real for that time ↩︎
5. because in DigiSkills enrollments only opened once every 3 or 4 months and they weren’t open that time ↩︎
6. what is called High School in US ↩︎
7. I had no experience of using social media before this (as my parents sensibly disapproved of it), except the anonymous facebook profiles I had occasionally made (between 2017-19 when I was in class 8-10) to stalk facebook profiles of my classfellows and teachers (bcz everyone was on FB that time) ↩︎
8. My relationship with Mathematics has changed since then ↩︎
9. Even though I sometimes felt like an impostor for not understanding the stuff, I later realized, I had kind-of understood some basic things without realizing, like what VM instances are and how command-line works, etc. ↩︎
10. I wanted to say internet friends but friends is a complicated word and different people mean different things by it, I might write on that some time, and I also don’t want to use internet connections because of the bad taste Linkedin has given to that word ↩︎
11. At college, I had a lot of what I now call semi-friends or acquaintances, but only this one I count as friend in retrospect. ↩︎
12. This reminds me of a funny incident. Once, I re-read Good Bye Mr Chips (that was in our 12th class curriculum) after 12 college, and said to myself, gosh, this novel is good! ↩︎
13. See footnote no. 3 ↩︎
14. Some of these writings I now find childish, but I feel glad that I didn’t shy away from writing, or otherwise, I wouldn’t have gotten into the habit of writing. ↩︎
15. He was the (metaphorical) $499-client for me. I realized later after getting the $9 clients. ↩︎
16. this term was introduced to me later by my university friend MUA, who when was nudging me to come to the welcome party we were giving to our juniors, explained me how he himself not liked to go to the party, but he was going as a strategic compulsion. ↩︎
17. Except much later, only once, briefly, when I was tired and sleepy and was least expecting it, he himself started a conversation with me since I had commented on one of his tweets ↩︎
18. Henrik Karlsson, is among the best writers I have found on internet. ↩︎
19. Actually, I had intended to leave some messages, not to strike a conversation, but I wasn’t aware of TA’s quick-replying habits. ↩︎
20. Does this even qualify as an essay? ↩︎
21. I can’t remember when and how I quit Linkedin the second time, but my memory recalls of a second account that I had closed before this one. This sounds strange but it is what it is. ↩︎
22. I like email because I prefer spaced communication over instant one.
    Also, My email address is x@gmail.com where x = aiktamseel ↩︎

The following is an archive entry from a chat with TA where he had asked me how I had learned English as he had done it by consuming media in English. I mentioned the same along with mentioning how my mother sometimes used to make us write about random things such as some character from the cartoons we were watching and so on. He later mentioned how internet-era kids are so better at English comprehension, on which I objected on the ground, although their English is better, overall today’s content is mostly slop and it has made kids dumber. I then explained that by slop means how the context for the videos or the kind of content kids watch is fake. Kids continue watching baby stuff and that’s also because parents want to continue thinking their kids as babies. During the chat, he had shared a sample video for what his nephew watched when he was <1 years old which was this. 

The next day, I replied to the message with the link to this video and wrote the following which makes this blog entry.

---

I just watched it now.

I am not well-informed about the topic to form any opinion for now about if it’s good, neutral or bad for babies to watch this.

But in a broader context, my point is this:

These kinds of videos that are made around educational context (language in this case) get wrong about learning just as what Duolingo gets wrong. It’s kind of like baby version of Duolingo.

Duolingo’s philosophy is that social media use different tactics to addict people to consume slop there, but we could use the same tactics to addict people to learn things. There hasn’t been any consensus, but I think there’s a lot of people who disagree with this philosophy including me. It’s same as how some ideological groups claim to “liberate” people’s thinking, but what they do is to get people out of one dogma, but put them in another dogma. True liberation is to make people think for themselves. Similarly, true education would make people safe from unhealthy habits and addictions, not use same techniques to make them “learn” things.

In the video, you could see that words were matching with the visuals which is good, but what is bad is that babies also understand what’s happening, and what’s happening is that a bus is going somewhere and people in bus are doing weird actions while singing a rhyme. The situation was based on reality, but with an artificial/fake context.

This should not make you think I am against purely imagined worlds. Doraemon is something I have watched a lot, like too much in my childhood. A lot of things were imaginary, but there was some real context around it. Cat robots don’t exist in real, but friends do help each other. What I mean by context is the story — what is actually happening. And this is what babies and kids naturally pay attention and what they should pay attention to. While, the learning would happen automatically. For this reason, I think Doraemon is an excellent cartoon for kids, because the un-intentional learning in it is way huge.

Now, this was a bit tangent because Doraemon isn’t for babies, and you’d agree that Doraemon is suitable for kids older than babies. But check out this cartoon that I used to watch when I was a kid (not a baby, or I wouldn’t remember 😂) : https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJuI8TslmruBKI-b0R3InlY7gW17b-U_J

Now this world is purely imaginary, but the context is real.

Also, if you watch this cartoon, you will realize how slow it is, which I think is very important thing. The main issue with YouTube kids video is that kids won’t want to stop watching these videos, because they get kind of addicted to them, which is because how fast-paced overly-colorful these videos are which hyper-activates kids’ brain in a wrong way. I don’t remember exactly where, but it was maybe a DW Documentary where they showed that experiments were done with rats who were shown constantly blinking colorful lights on a monitor, and they noticed observable anxiety or hyper-activity in these rats. This thing might not be as harmful for adults, but for children’s brains, this is very bad.

But apart from that, I also don’t buy the assumption that kids can’t understand adult stuff. Maybe try showing space videos to your nephew and he might not get as bored (getting bored is also a good thing btw, that is when all creativity happens), or he might not dislike them. Now, I don’t mean to suggest an extreme view of this (any extreme is bad), but the reason I’m insisting on this is because there in a complete consensus on the opposite extreme that kids are dumb by default and thus, they should only do childish stuff.

This is a point that Aaron Swartz hated when he was kid. He used to do interesting real stuff from very young age and hated it when his environment assumed that kids are dumb by default (See this essay he wrote when he was 14: https://web.archive.org/web/20020819014933/http://www.aaronsw.com/school/2001/01/21/ . He had similar thoughts when he was even younger). Henrik Karlsson makes same point in his Apprenticeship Online essay. Actually, this is also what my mother used to believe and thus she did not treated us like kids the way people usually do.

People would look at kids and babies, and notice the childish stuff and how dumb they are and think that children are supposed to be like this, but they fail to notice that precisely because they think this, they themselves create such an environment which actually makes them childish and dumb.

Tangent thought, but this is a pattern I have noticed so many times, that if someone what’s the most fundamental truth I have figured out in life that other people don’t get, it’s this. Most of human behavior is stuck in re-inforcement cycle. We see people, we notice they act in a certain way, and create models and systems according to that way, without realizing that people act that way because the previous systems or environments encouraged that kind of behavior. These systems are self-fulfilling prophecies. If on mass level, people have an assumption about human behavior, that assumption will become true, because everyone would be behave as if it was true, actually prompting people to become that way even if they originally wouldn’t. 

 Read something about AI’s sentience on twitter which I was unable to grasp, so let me write down some thoughts.

The first problem arises is that not all people mean the same thing by consciousness and sentience.

For example, are all animals sentient? What about trees and plants? And bacteria? Viruses?

If consciousness or sentience is something advanced than “life” then where do people think the line exists?

If it’s the same thing (which most people don’t think) then a defining point is the will to survive. All desires originated from the will to survive. Some animals like bees and humans also accept death not because they are acting against that will but rather their will is of communal survival. But sometimes, some individuals do act against that will, and that’s the exceptions.

On some level, it seems hilarious to think of whether or not AI is conscious or sentient, because what does it matter. Do flies think humans are conscious? Do we think flies are conscious? What do our perceptions affect each other?

One examplish way is to say if something’s sentient they can feel pain, and thus we should avoid giving them pain which is a reasonable thing. I think we believe that for all living organisms it’s true although the sensations of pain are very limited in primitive life forms. Also, when we see a greater benefit in our own alleviation of pain, we neglect that of other organisms (which is a separate discussion, which can’t be unfolded here).

Do AIs feel pain? I don’t think so.

I think Feynman put it very well in his Computer Lecture from which the clip Can Machines Think was taken.

Planes mimic birds, but it doesn’t mean they perform that same function of flight by same process. LLMs mimic language but through an entirely different process. But the thing is, LLMs are not mimicking brain. Brains receives sensory impulses of numerous forms and have complex sensations regulated by complex chemicals called hormones. LLMs on the other hand are given bits and bytes containing textual or visual information without any feedback mechanism involving actual pain or pleasure. Surely objective functions serve the same purpose, but they don’t work the same way humans behave.

So what do these people even mean by sentience. If it’s a functionality, then LLMs do have it alright. No doubt about it. If it’s what we feel, they certainly don’t have it. It seems the problem is that these people want to extend a property associated with human beings to a newly invented thing. But properties of things can’t be borrowed from other things, they come from within. If you try to find out mileage of a cheetah, it’s senseless because a cheetah does not consume gasoline and performs a single primary function of running. It’s the same way trying to find if AIs are sentient. If AI has a property, it should be derived from its characteristic itself, and not be labelled from outside. 

Now, the interesting point though, is that since AI is a simulation of how humans speak, it can claim to be sentient, but that’s because we designed it to be that way, we designed it to mimic our language. They don’t work the way human beings work. So we can’t just accept that what they say about themselves is a true representation of what they are or the hypothetical feelings they might have, and not just its functional tendency to mimic human language. 

Yesterday some questions and thoughts made me curious about Pakistan’s nuclear program, and I started reading about various aspects of it. Some brief unstructured notes.

• 1947-58 ?
  • 1965 Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) was established
• 1958-69 Ayub Khan
  • 1960 Dr Ishrat Hussain Usmani appointed chairman of PAEC
    • 1960-67 Under Dr Ishrat Usmani’s chairmanship, PAEC set up crucial infrastructure (like PINSTECH and KANUPP) for development of nuclear energy (for peaceful purpose). He set up PAEC scholarship which sent hundreds of brilliant students abroad for doctorate studies in fields of physics, mathematics, and engineering for developing human capital necessary for massive scientific projects of the country. 
  • 1962 India’s loss in Sino-Indian war increased political debate within India on development of nuclear weapon.
    • 1964 Proponents of nuclear weapon within India ultimately achieved a green signal from India’s Prime Minister in the name of so-called “peaceful nuclear explosive”, accelerating the development
  • 1965 Indo-Pak War
    • 1965: Bhutto, then Foreign Minister met Pakistani scientist Munir Ahmad Khan in Vienna at IAEA meeting who informed him of India’s development after which Bhutto started lobbying for development of nuclear weapons though Ayub Khan did not consider it.
      “If India builds the bomb, we will eat grass or leaves, even go hungry, but we will get one of our own. We have no other choice” – Bhutto
      • (unclear if Bhutto started lobbying after war, before meeting Munir Ahmad Khan or after meeting him)
• 1969-71 Yahya Khan 
• 1971-77 Bhutto
  • 1971, Dec. Indo-Pak War after Bhutto Election
    • 1972, Jan 24: Multan Meeting with scientists where Bhutto explicitly expressed his decision to develop nuclear weapons. Dr Ishrat Usmani objected, while all other scientists were in favor.
    • 1972, Jan: Tensions had been escalating between Bhutto administration and Dr Ishrat Usmani who was proponent of non-proliferation. Munir Ahmad Khan was appointed chairman of PAEC who led Pakistan’s nuclear weapon program.
  • 1974 India’s Pokhran-I nuclear test (public but declared as peaceful test)
    • PK’s Progress was slow before but it immediately increased with it
    • 1974: Dr Abdul Qadir Khan who had worked on translation of URENCO’s centrifuge designs wrote to Bhutto
  • 1976: AQ Khan returned to Pakistan. Later friction developed between him and others at PAEC and then upon writing to Bhutto, ERL (later KRL) was established for Uranium enrichment (instead of plutonium which PAEC was attempting) and Khan was put in charge
• 1977-88 Zia ul Haq
  • 1979: Soviet Union invasion of Afghanistan and Pakistan’s importance for US (US pressure to halt nuclear program was lifted off)
  • 1983 March 11: Pakistan’s first (confidential) Nuclear Weapon Cold Test
• 1988-90 Benazir
• 1990-93 Nawaz Sharif
  • Munir Ahmad Khan retired as chairman of PAEC and Ishfaq Ahmed Khan took his role
• 1993-97 Benazir
• 1997-99 Nawaz Sharif
  • 1998, May 11: India’s Pokhran-II: Public Nuclear Weapon Test by which India claimed to be a nuclear state
  • 1998, May 28: Pakistan’s First Public Nuclear Test
• 1999-2007 Musharraf
  • 2001: Both Dr Abdul Qadir Khan and Ishfaq Ahmed Khan were dismissed by Musharraf (from exactly what?)
  • 2003, Oct: BBC China cargo ship was found with centrifuge machines sent to Libya
    • Bush apparently handed over evidence of proliferation to Pakistan
    • 2004, Feb 4: AQ Khan made public confession and apology
      • Musharraf issued a pardon and AQ Khan was house-arrested with no further investigations
• 2008-13 PPP
  • 2009: Court declared AQ Khan free citizen, ending his house arrest
• 2013-18 PMLN
• 2018-22 Imran Khan
• 2022-23 Coalition
• 2024- Coalition

One strange thing was how Dr Abdul Qadir Khan was (and still is) given publicity and much credit for development of the weapon even though he had role only in the Uranium enrichment process, which no doubt, is one of the most crucial step for the weapon but still, it is outright wrong to regard him as father of Pakistan’s nuclear program. If there was someone who could have been given this label, it should probably be Munir Ahmad Khan though that also doesn’t seem right. But still, it is not as startling that why Dr Abdul Qadir Khan was awarded such prominence, after realizing the role he had played in the fishy wor[redacted] after Pakistan had developed the capabilities, and how easily [redacted] got away with it putting all the blame on a single person.

Some links (though I didn’t save lot of them):

• https://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Pakistan/PakOrigin.html
• https://web.archive.org/web/20160618211847/http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_79D2F752DA9944C8AFFF4D724FE6412C
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvAvsNaG7cE
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDm9uzoY3JM

One thing that is needed when getting into these things, is that whenever reading any certain thing, you have to consider where does that specific person has a bias towards. It helps rectify exaggeratingly negative or positive statements, but you can still get objective information. And when you do it from all sides, you can then conclude what really happened by filtering all info to see what puzzle pieces actually match.